For those of you that missed today’s chat with Tom on the Unicly community Telegram, we created a transcript for you to take a look!
Start
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 01:26]
hey guys
Cartolima, [10.06.21 01:27]
[In reply to Tom Dwan (public)]
[ GIF ]
Cartolima, [10.06.21 01:27]
[ GIF ]
Unicly Admin, [10.06.21 01:27]
[In reply to Tom Dwan (public)]
Hi Tom! 😁 Great to have you here! 🥳
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 01:30]
hey
0xLeia, [10.06.21 01:30]
Hey Tom :)
0xLeia, [10.06.21 01:30]
[ GIF ]
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 01:30]
haha
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 01:30]
so, as we discussed briefly leia…
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 01:31]
i think that there are many new opportunities which the unicly protocol opens up…
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 01:31]
also there are a few potential pitfalls
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 01:31]
im sure ill miss a ton of them but id like to help try to jumpstart a discussion
0xLeia, [10.06.21 01:31]
sounds good
0xLeia, [10.06.21 01:31]
thanks for taking the time
0xLeia, [10.06.21 01:32]
to go over your thoughts here with the community
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 01:32]
happy to… i find a lot of people have very interesting thoughts on how new incentives/game mechanics (maybe theres a better word here, i failed out of english) can develop, and interesting ways to frame the problem set
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 01:33]
but often people feel a bit afraid to jump into that, because inherently most of your guesses annd suggestions will be “wrong””
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 01:33]
meaning there are at least elements which need to be significantly refined
0xLeia, [10.06.21 01:33]
hmm got it
0xLeia, [10.06.21 01:33]
so where do you suggest we start?
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 01:34]
well so i tried to breakdown myself into some guesses that i think are important for the unicly protocol.
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 01:34]
and im sure these arent worded ideally and are probably not even chosen ideally etc
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 01:34]
but again just trying to jumpstart a discussion here
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 01:34]
so i look at it like this
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 01:35]
1) tech
2) quality nft’s
3) retail interest
4) token liquidity/price
5) real flow/volume on the protocol
minxhi, [10.06.21 01:37]
ok can u elaborate some more on these please
0xLeia, [10.06.21 01:37]
[In reply to Tom Dwan (public)]
ok — so these are the things we need to do well in order for the protocol to succeed?
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 01:37]
and if you look at it like this, currently its basically:
1) tech 10%
2) qual nft’s ~85.5%
3) retail interest ~0%
4) token liquidity/price ~4.5%
5) real flow/volume ~ -.3%
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 01:37]
just my guesses, im sure they arent ideal etc
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 01:38]
but im trying to help break down the problem set of unic rewards into how to add value
0xLeia, [10.06.21 01:38]
[In reply to Tom Dwan (public)]
can you explain where the math comes from?
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 01:38]
ok so 1 (tech), theres 10% to dev team
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 01:39]
2 (qual nft’s) these are effectively the farming rewards for uTOKEN’s
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 01:39]
at least in my mind
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 01:39]
3) retail interest… there isnt really any significant incentive for uTOKEN creators to bring in retail
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 01:39]
4) token liquidity/price (the unic/eth pool rewards had about 4.5% last i checked maybe slightly off)
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 01:40]
5) real flow/volume… so basically i think its in the interest of unic holders to have a viable “financial system” of sorts for nft’s
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 01:40]
and for that to happen i think its important to incentivize bids on nft’s etc etc (im not claiming to know how to do this… again just trying to jumpstart a discussion)
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 01:41]
does this make some sense to you?
0xLeia, [10.06.21 01:41]
yeah I’d have to think about it a bit
0xLeia, [10.06.21 01:42]
but I think I see where the problem is
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 01:42]
so if you look at the example of retail
Rayyan Agrawal, [10.06.21 01:42]
[In reply to Tom Dwan (public)]
what kind of incentives are you looking at?
Cloverfield, [10.06.21 01:42]
What provides the liquidity on the NFT’s?
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 01:42]
i dont think it should be the problem of the unicly protocol to bring on retail (not saying that the protocol isnt happy if retail comes)
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 01:43]
but for example if the uTOKEN creators were incentivized to have wider communities
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 01:43]
and more users etc
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 01:43]
a lot of interesting game mechanics could develop
Jay Minestro, [10.06.21 01:43]
[In reply to 0xLeia]
hey.. i wish i could say the same but maybe you could help us understand where the problem is..
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 01:44]
[In reply to Cloverfield]
so imagine if you had some incentive to bid on nft’s (with certain parameters for what was a quality bid)
0xLeia, [10.06.21 01:44]
[In reply to Tom Dwan (public)]
for sure, that would be great
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 01:44]
i would imagine that to come much later
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 01:44]
[In reply to Jay Minestro]
basically currently where is the incentive to add longterm value to the protocol?
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 01:44]
once people make a uTOKEN where is the incentive to add more nft’s? to add more value? to bid on nft’s? to bring on retail?
0xLeia, [10.06.21 01:44]
[In reply to Jay Minestro]
the problem is that the below breakdown of how we use UNIC to incentivize what’s important for the protocol… is a bit skewed
1) tech 10%
2) qual nft’s ~85.5%
3) retail interest ~0%
4) token liquidity/price ~4.5%
5) real flow/volume ~ -.3%
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 01:44]
now people may do those because they are nice
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 01:44]
or interested
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 01:45]
but if you align incentives slightly more i think things would become much easier
0xLeia, [10.06.21 01:45]
[In reply to Tom Dwan (public)]
so I think there is incentive to add more NFTs
0xLeia, [10.06.21 01:45]
the reward weights are set so that once a collection adds more NFTs, NAV increases
Rayyan Agrawal, [10.06.21 01:45]
What’s your main advantage over your competitors?
0xLeia, [10.06.21 01:46]
which gives them more UNIC rewards for that pool
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 01:46]
[In reply to 0xLeia]
ok true, good point leia
0xLeia, [10.06.21 01:46]
[In reply to Rayyan Agrawal]
I think our main advantage is that we’ve created a better tech & system than any other fractionalization platform
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 01:46]
i guess i should reframe
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 01:46]
basically i think that the cost to drop an nft sometimes may not be properly incentivized
Rayyan Agrawal, [10.06.21 01:46]
[In reply to 0xLeia]
What made you say that
Rayyan Agrawal, [10.06.21 01:47]
just curious
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 01:47]
for example if the utoken creator now only has a smaller amount of their uTOKEN
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 01:48]
[In reply to Rayyan Agrawal]
my opinion would be a better mechanism for recombining nft’s once they are fractionalized (and a lot of potential possibilities that can happen in the future from that once the tech is there)
0xLeia, [10.06.21 01:48]
[In reply to Rayyan Agrawal]
we can discuss this in a little bit after we chat w/ Tom, who’s trying to help us find solutions for the problems
Rayyan Agrawal, [10.06.21 01:48]
ok
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 01:48]
im typing on my computer btw and im used to telegram on phone so if theres a buncha typos and stuff im sorry
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 01:48]
but wanted to be able to type faster
0xLeia, [10.06.21 01:49]
[In reply to Tom Dwan (public)]
an idea I had was for Unicly v2 — implementing the individual unlocking of NFTs within a collection
0xLeia, [10.06.21 01:49]
instead of bid proceeds being distributed pro rata to uToken holders, the bid proceeds on individual NFT unlocks are used to buy back the uToken
Rotem Yakir, [10.06.21 01:49]
[In reply to 0xLeia]
NAV?
Jay Minestro, [10.06.21 01:49]
[In reply to 0xLeia]
is there a clause where u would remove underperforming collections..?
0xLeia, [10.06.21 01:49]
[In reply to Rotem Yakir]
the appraisal price of the NFT collection
Rotem Yakir, [10.06.21 01:49]
Oh ok cool
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 01:50]
[In reply to 0xLeia]
yes that is an example of why you would want bids on individual nft’s (for now perhaps you would give a much smaller amount and more when the tech is there)
Cloverfield, [10.06.21 01:50]
[In reply to 0xLeia]
Sometimes, less is more.. But what you say is true as well
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 01:50]
[In reply to Jay Minestro]
my first thought to that would be it sounds extreme… but what if instead their rewards went down slightly or slowly overtime
Chris McCann, [10.06.21 01:50]
[In reply to 0xLeia]
yeah I’ve had people ping me wanting to buy specific items in my collection (uCM) but not the whole collection.
right now the experience for someone who wants to bid on NFT’s its a bit confusing.
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 01:50]
[In reply to Chris McCann]
and if its a bit confusing i think you need some incentive
Jay Minestro, [10.06.21 01:50]
[In reply to 0xLeia]
this sounds awesome
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 01:50]
to bridge the gab
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 01:50]
gap*
Rayyan Agrawal, [10.06.21 01:51]
Do you have plans on adding any other special features to unicly?
Jay Minestro, [10.06.21 01:51]
[In reply to 0xLeia]
u lost me here
0xLeia, [10.06.21 01:51]
[In reply to Chris McCann]
true, it is a pretty big systemic change to implement individual unlocking though, I think it’s something that we’d solve for in v2
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 01:51]
i think a lot of interesting things would come to light with some reasonable incentives
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 01:51]
which we probably wouldnt be able to think of most of now or soon
0xLeia, [10.06.21 01:51]
[In reply to Tom Dwan (public)]
what do you think the incentives should be?
Chris McCann, [10.06.21 01:51]
[In reply to 0xLeia]
yep of course, just relaying some feedback as one of the collection creators
0xLeia, [10.06.21 01:51]
do you have some sort of a range
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 01:51]
[In reply to 0xLeia]
i think this is something im pretty bad at tbh
Rayyan Agrawal, [10.06.21 01:52]
[In reply to 0xLeia]
+ 1
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 01:52]
but i do think i can help lay out some frameworks to think about the problem
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 01:52]
and then try to help with the community discussion part some etc
Rayyan Agrawal, [10.06.21 01:52]
what incentives do you have in mind
Rayyan Agrawal, [10.06.21 01:52]
that can work for unicly
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 01:52]
1) tech 8–15
Jay Minestro, [10.06.21 01:52]
[In reply to Chris McCann]
confusin for u more confusing for newbs like me
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 01:53]
sorry sent early dumb on comp
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 01:53]
1) tech 8–15
2) qual nft 50–70
3) retail interest 10–20
4) token price/liquidity 6–12
5) real flow/volume 5–15
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 01:53]
so imagine this
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 01:53]
its prolly flawed, but lets try n imagine it for a min
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 01:54]
this wouldnt be much of a farming hit on utokens (and i think unic price would appreciate enough to compensate and probably more)
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 01:54]
and then you would give room to start incentivizing some bids on individual nft’s, to start incentivizing utokens to get retail interest
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 01:55]
and even if the tech isnt there tomorrow for people to be able to buy individual nft’s
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 01:55]
i think people and groups/organizations would start seeing the possibilities which unlock through unicly
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 01:55]
im sure those numbers arent “right”
Rayyan Agrawal, [10.06.21 01:55]
What’s your predicted mint rate for UNIC in the next 6 to 12 mos?
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 01:55]
but i also dont think its too important to solve for “ideal” right now
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 01:56]
and while basically everything ive said above is stuff im guessing at, that i dont think i (or anyone) knows great
0xLeia, [10.06.21 01:56]
[In reply to Rayyan Agrawal]
https://docs.unic.ly/unic-token-and-fair-launch
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 01:56]
the one thing i would say im an expert in is the framework… that when new game mechanics happen you dont want to overfocus on the “ideal”
0xLeia, [10.06.21 01:57]
[In reply to Tom Dwan (public)]
ok, I think the framework makes sense
0xLeia, [10.06.21 01:57]
[In reply to Tom Dwan (public)]
this looks like a healthier balance
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 01:57]
because theres often many moving parts and you can miss the most valuable opportunities if you are afraid to move and move reasonably
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 01:57]
theres a saying i like which is progress not perfection
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 01:57]
and another which is dont let perfect be the enemy of good
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 01:58]
so basically my point is i think we should try to start the discussion of how to move towards more stable incentives that provide longterm value
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 01:58]
and theres no rush to change that all tomorrow
Cloverfield, [10.06.21 01:58]
[In reply to Tom Dwan (public)]
Incentives make the world go round 😉
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 01:58]
[In reply to Cloverfield]
haha agreed 😝
Rayyan Agrawal, [10.06.21 01:58]
[In reply to Cloverfield]
yeah thats why this was my first question earlier haha
0xLeia, [10.06.21 01:59]
maybe we as a community can discuss a couple solutions on how exactly we can implement the right incentive amounts in each category
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 01:59]
if you get incentives reasonable then its a lot easier to ask/hope people are nice
Jay Minestro, [10.06.21 01:59]
[In reply to 0xLeia]
+1
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 01:59]
[In reply to 0xLeia]
yea i think that would be a good idea… and maybe its even slightly different categories
MangoJam, [10.06.21 01:59]
[In reply to Cloverfield]
we all know this by heart 😆
0xLeia, [10.06.21 02:00]
Tom while you’re here, I heard you hold some uJENNY
0xLeia, [10.06.21 02:00]
what do you think about how much rewards you’re getting
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 02:00]
haha yes
0xLeia, [10.06.21 02:00]
there was some pushback from community before on that
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 02:00]
um i like rewards…
Jay Minestro, [10.06.21 02:00]
[In reply to Tom Dwan (public)]
+1
Jay Minestro, [10.06.21 02:00]
[In reply to Cloverfield]
+1
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 02:01]
[In reply to 0xLeia]
yea, so i do think the uJENNY rewards are a bit high for the longterm health of the protocol
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 02:01]
and i dont really have any great ideas of what to do about that, but i think its reasonable to start a discussion
Jay Minestro, [10.06.21 02:01]
but seems they are strongest contributor, referencing post comment on uAPE whitelist
Cloverfield, [10.06.21 02:01]
[ Photo ]
I hate to jump ship and bail. I wasn’t really in here, but Tom 🙌 You’re still the real deal! Have to go out and play some ball ⚽️
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 02:02]
haha
Jay Minestro, [10.06.21 02:02]
[In reply to Cloverfield]
get some goals in the name of unic bud hahahaha
0xLeia, [10.06.21 02:02]
[In reply to Tom Dwan (public)]
all collections will eventually get diluted down
0xLeia, [10.06.21 02:02]
since emission rates do keep decreasing
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 02:02]
and i also think if unicly is gonna work on some game mechanics stuff and better incentives, it could be good timing to put some pressure on uJENNY to be a part of the solutions
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 02:02]
i hope its not too much because i got some bags 🤣🤣🤣
0xLeia, [10.06.21 02:03]
haha nice
Jay Minestro, [10.06.21 02:03]
really feel that there should be some metrics to determine underperfomring so they can do more contribution wise
0xLeia, [10.06.21 02:03]
ok I’ve got like 2 more questions for you
0xLeia, [10.06.21 02:03]
before you go
0xLeia, [10.06.21 02:03]
[In reply to Jay Minestro]
agreed
Rayyan Agrawal, [10.06.21 02:03]
[In reply to Jay Minestro]
agree
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 02:04]
[In reply to 0xLeia]
sounds good but then u owe me a unicly tshirt… deal?
0xLeia, [10.06.21 02:04]
Some ideas I had (to help retail interest maybe) were:
- Take a fee on each new uToken issued, Unicly community vests it and can sell the uToken for UNIC
- Create a polkastarter-type IDO marketplace on Unicly that allows top UNIC holders
- Let people lock up their UNIC, and and we incentivize those that have longer lock-up periods by giving them more rewards. We also (optionally) allow uToken creators to add uTokens to this locked up UNIC pool, to give even more incentives to lock up UNIC. Collections that do this get rewarded with higher UNIC farming weightings.
0xLeia, [10.06.21 02:04]
[In reply to Tom Dwan (public)]
😂😂
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 02:05]
[In reply to 0xLeia]
hahaha i actually heard something similar to one of these in miami 🤔
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 02:05]
these all seem very smart and reasonable to me
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 02:05]
so i dont think im very good at saying if ideas like this are “good”
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 02:05]
if u look at my poker play i make more mistakes than most people
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 02:06]
i think im pretty good at saying something is at least “reasonable”
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 02:06]
or identifying outliers (for example there effectively being zero retail interest incentive currently
Jay Minestro, [10.06.21 02:06]
[In reply to 0xLeia]
additionaly a collection should reach a certain contribution for any unlocking
0xLeia, [10.06.21 02:06]
[In reply to Tom Dwan (public)]
maybe some of our devs were there 🤷♀️
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 02:06]
but to me these all seem interesting and i hope more discussion forms around them
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 02:06]
thats all i got while overtires
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 02:06]
tired*
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 02:06]
[In reply to 0xLeia]
hahaha
Jay Minestro, [10.06.21 02:07]
[In reply to Tom Dwan (public)]
with lesser bets on the table i bet hahaha
0xLeia, [10.06.21 02:07]
and what about collections that are quite inactive right now?
0xLeia, [10.06.21 02:07]
there are collections that are very actively doing more and working on marketing to a wider community
0xLeia, [10.06.21 02:07]
others not so much
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 02:08]
is this the 2nd question or is it a 1.5?
Jay Minestro, [10.06.21 02:08]
[In reply to 0xLeia]
perhaps a bit of a penalty for not carrying their weight
0xLeia, [10.06.21 02:08]
if another collection came around with the same theme — let’s just say for example, uPUNK, what would happen?
0xLeia, [10.06.21 02:08]
[In reply to Tom Dwan (public)]
2.5 haha
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 02:08]
ahh ok i see
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 02:08]
ok so i obviously have a bias here
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 02:09]
i have a bit of jenny and only small amounts of other uTOKENS
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 02:09]
so hmm
Jay Minestro, [10.06.21 02:09]
[In reply to 0xLeia]
whats wrong with that, wouldnt that incentivize the other guy to do better?
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 02:09]
hmm sec
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 02:09]
ok so i think i have one interesting way to frame the problem
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 02:09]
i got quite a bit of uBEEPLE actually
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 02:09]
but… while i hope uBEEPLE does well…
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 02:10]
i hear theres a pretty valuable beeple out there
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 02:10]
so imagine if metacorvin (did i spell that right)? made a new uREALBEEPLE with his 69m $ nft 🤔🤔🤔
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 02:10]
haha
Adam, [10.06.21 02:11]
[In reply to 0xLeia]
All of these are solid ideas and represent good long-term practices.
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 02:11]
in this case… i think that it wouldnt make too much sense to keep the current uBEEPLE at even close to similar rewards
0xLeia, [10.06.21 02:11]
[In reply to Tom Dwan (public)]
Metakovan :D
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 02:11]
so with uPUNK or something, i think its kindve better if theres only one uPUNK thats whitelisted
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 02:12]
but its a balance, if you had some collection that represents very popular nft’s (for example beeple/punk etc)
Dust, [10.06.21 02:12]
Is uJenny punk that was recently bought more valuable than the Upunks in that collection?
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 02:12]
[In reply to 0xLeia]
oooooops 🤣😓
0xLeia, [10.06.21 02:12]
[In reply to Tom Dwan (public)]
but what if someone came along with uPUNK-APES where it was just ape punks?
0xLeia, [10.06.21 02:12]
where each one is magnitudes more expensive than floors
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 02:13]
anyway if another came along and had way more valuable beeple i think it would be important for the unicly community to brainstorm what to do
0xLeia, [10.06.21 02:13]
[In reply to Dust]
individually yes I believe so — they bought a rare one
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 02:13]
and i dont think you need to get it perfect but its healthy to have those discussions
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 02:13]
and that can also incentivize uTOKENs to be more active
Jay Minestro, [10.06.21 02:13]
[In reply to Tom Dwan (public)]
+1'
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 02:13]
and try to keep their moat
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 02:13]
as the only uBEEPLE etc
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 02:14]
so as an example imagine Metakovan decided he wanted to add his beeple to uBEEPLE and he wanted 98% of the supply
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 02:14]
to me that would seem reasonable
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 02:14]
maybe 97 or 99 who knows
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 02:14]
but you would want some way to pressure the current uBEEPLE holders to be cool
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 02:15]
and some consequences if they werent (less rewards or if extreme maybe losing whitelist fully)
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 02:15]
and i think these are important discussions to start having for the protocol
0xLeia, [10.06.21 02:15]
ok — I think this is super interesting
0xLeia, [10.06.21 02:16]
I’m sure the community will also help come up with more ideas to optimize more over time too
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 02:16]
[In reply to 0xLeia]
👕
0xLeia, [10.06.21 02:16]
thanks for shedding like on a way to frame the problem more clearly
Jay Minestro, [10.06.21 02:16]
my thoughts are based entirely on a brick and mortar shop as is my experience owning one..
i feel that u have a drag in your wings here. essentially when theres an imbalance in the books, the first thing i do is sell off slow moving stocks to make room for new ones
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 02:16]
[In reply to 0xLeia]
happy to try and help… i dont think the next step is something im very good at actually. but the initial framing of the problem i hope i helped a few people with, and hopefully it can benefit unicly
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 02:17]
and ty for having me @LeiaFisherOne … im a very big unicly fan
Jae Chung | Jenny DAO, [10.06.21 02:17]
Hi Tom! big fan
Jae Chung | Jenny DAO, [10.06.21 02:17]
:D
Dust, [10.06.21 02:17]
👏
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 02:18]
if that wasnt clear its just because im real overtired haha
0xLeia, [10.06.21 02:18]
[In reply to Tom Dwan (public)]
Thank you so much!!!
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 02:18]
[In reply to Jae Chung | Jenny DAO]
heya 👋
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 02:18]
ok im gonna try to sleep for a week
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 02:18]
i need it after miami
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 02:18]
see u guys 🤣🤣🤣
Castra, [10.06.21 02:18]
He could name it u69m
Jae Chung | Jenny DAO, [10.06.21 02:18]
💪💪
Jay Minestro, [10.06.21 02:19]
Thank you for the insights Tom
Castra, [10.06.21 02:19]
[ GIF ]
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 02:19]
[In reply to Castra]
hahaha
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 02:19]
[In reply to Jay Minestro]
ya i wouldnt apply too much value to them like
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 02:19]
just try to use them as a place to start
Tom Dwan (public), [10.06.21 02:19]
kindve thing
End
